Churches passing the buck

HRM city council has asked for a report from staff re: taking over the maintenance of five cemeteries since their associated churches have closed and been torn down. Why should the city bear the cost for this? I assume the churches received money for the burials in the first place. The church still exists as an institution, even if that particular branch is closed. Let them pay for it. Does the city pay to clean up the contaminated soil of every lot that used to house a gas station? At least the gas stations payed fucking taxes. — Tired of paying for your hobby

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

Add a comment

Remember, it's entirely possible to disagree without spiralling into a thread of negativity and personal attacks. We have the right to remove (and you have the right to report) any comments that go against our policy.