The councillor, at City Hall.
City councillor Matt Whitman says he should have been explicitly warned that his conversation with a CBC reporter was on the record, but the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's ombudsman disagrees.
Whitman submitted an official complaint to CBC’s ombudsman back in February after a phone interview with journalist Emma Davie about his retweet of a white supremacist group.
The councillor claims Davie didn’t clearly identify she was seeking comment and failed to inform him the interview was being recorded.
“You were shocked to hear parts of your phone conversation broadcast on the evening television newscast,” writes ombudsman Esther Enkin in her recently released review of the complaint
There’s no explicit CBC policy requiring a warning from reporters that a conversation is on the record. A politician, writes Enkin, should probably know that.
“It is essential
an interviewee is aware of recording
, but calling a public figure about a matter in the public interest does not require explicit
mention of how it is to be used, as it is understood to be on the record.”
Davie spoke with Whitman twice after the city councillor retweeted a letter from a white supremacist group
criticizing the removal of the Cornwallis statue.
The first call was deleted because background noise made it unusable for broadcast, necessitating the second call. Davie tells the ombudsman’s office she remembers telling Whitman it was “Emma from CBC” and that she was turning on her recorder. But as that recording was deleted, CBC can’t prove who’s right.
“I can make no definitive ruling here since there are two versions of events I cannot verify,” writes Enkin.
Nevertheless, the ombudsman ultimately ruled the lack of an explicit mention of being on-the-record doesn’t count as a violation of CBC’s policy.
Nancy Waugh, the managing editor for CBC News in Atlantic Canada, agreed that Davie could have been clearer about the circumstances of the call, but argues—in a response to Whitman's complaint—that it should have been “entirely obviously” a call from a CBC reporter constituted a professional interview.
“An experienced politician might well assume that his response to any reporter is on the record and likely to be used publicly,” writes Waugh.
Whitman has served as a member of Halifax Regional Council since 2012. He’s no stranger to media coverage
; lately using his public platform to criticize outlets—including Global Halifax, CTV, StarMetro Halifax
, the Chronicle Herald
and The Coast—whose coverage he doesn't agree with.
Shortly after Davie’s phone interview back in February, Whitman complained to reporters at City Hall
that journalists were calling and recording his voice “without my permission,” and then broadcasting “exactly what I said when I answered the phone.”
But Waugh points out Whitman never said he would have declined the interview if he knew it was for broadcast.
“I’m left to conclude that you were speaking to [Davie] honestly and that she accurately and honestly related your position to the audience,” she writes.
The councillor has been the target of dozens of public complaints so far in 2018. In response, last month Whitman's colleagues took the extraordinary step of censuring him
from participating in committee work until the end of May.
Whitman has consistently responded to the record number of complaints filed against him by saying Halifax has a “social media sensitivity problem.”