"The unconscionable side of whistling is in relation to flavoring." McHael Urphy
"Whistling in a coffee" is a neologism not found in the dictionary. Neither for that matter is "aural assault." However, the root derivation is obviously "ass wind" which, according to the Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English, refers to "my the moral sense of self-intelligence"
As with so many others, the question in respect to the legislation on whistling in public then ultimately devolves into one of Philosophy, in particular that of Moral Philosophy. However - and this is important - the bitcher has not engaged Moral Philosophy, particularly those grounds upon which the legislation on whistling in public might be see to be morally wrong. In other words, what moral principle has the legislation on whistlers been violated?
On the bitcher's showing the answer can only be: "None." In other words, the relationship between aural assaulter and ear bleeder not perspicuous. Therefore, one can only conclude that the bitches use of "whitsling" is in itself unconscionable. Next.
Recent Comments
Ahh, I love winter, when the bitch section switches from driver vs bicycle bitches to hipster haters venting about jackets they cant afford.
Unsure of the meaning of "door prize"?
Is it easier to spam the comment section than use a google search?
To win a door prize is to have a door opened into oneself whilst commuting by bicycle.
Avatar #108: A TYPE OF SPONGEBOB IM SURE
A discomfort as always,
Cheerios, good for the heart!
-Halifax Boy
"The unconscionable side of whistling is in relation to flavoring." McHael Urphy
"Whistling in a coffee" is a neologism not found in the dictionary. Neither for that matter is "aural assault." However, the root derivation is obviously "ass wind" which, according to the Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English, refers to "my the moral sense of self-intelligence"
As with so many others, the question in respect to the legislation on whistling in public then ultimately devolves into one of Philosophy, in particular that of Moral Philosophy. However - and this is important - the bitcher has not engaged Moral Philosophy, particularly those grounds upon which the legislation on whistling in public might be see to be morally wrong. In other words, what moral principle has the legislation on whistlers been violated?
On the bitcher's showing the answer can only be: "None." In other words, the relationship between aural assaulter and ear bleeder not perspicuous. Therefore, one can only conclude that the bitches use of "whitsling" is in itself unconscionable. Next.
(AVATAR #131: A SPONGEBOB PERTURBED)
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!